Dixie Outlet Mall Policy Review

The City of Mississauga’s Planning and Building Department is undertaking a land use review of the Dixie Outlet Mall site to help guide redevelopment. The City’s review will focus on key elements to achieve a complete community and set a policy framework to inform an official plan amendment. It will consider opportunities for new roads, pedestrian connections, transit supportive development, parks, a mix of land uses, including affordable housing and non-residential uses. The review will also consider heights that are of an appropriate development scale within the Lakeview neighbourhood area.

The City’s review of the lands is occurring simultaneously with a development application that has been submitted to the City in December 2022 by Slate Asset Management. The owner is proposing to demolish a portion of the mall and build five residential apartments in the northwest portion of the site. The site where the grocery store is located is owned by Choice Properties and no application has been made to the City. Under the Planning Act, the City is required to process a development application and within certain timelines. The City will work in collaboration with the property owners in coordinating the policy and the development application reviews. To find more information on the development application, file OZ/OPA 22-32 (1250 South Service Road) please click here.

Stay involved

Subscribe to receive news alerts about future engagements at the top of the page.

If you wish to mail your comments, please send them to: Karin Phuong, Planning and Building - City Planning Strategies, City of Mississauga, 300 City Centre Dr, Mississauga, ON L5B 3C1.

The City of Mississauga’s Planning and Building Department is undertaking a land use review of the Dixie Outlet Mall site to help guide redevelopment. The City’s review will focus on key elements to achieve a complete community and set a policy framework to inform an official plan amendment. It will consider opportunities for new roads, pedestrian connections, transit supportive development, parks, a mix of land uses, including affordable housing and non-residential uses. The review will also consider heights that are of an appropriate development scale within the Lakeview neighbourhood area.

The City’s review of the lands is occurring simultaneously with a development application that has been submitted to the City in December 2022 by Slate Asset Management. The owner is proposing to demolish a portion of the mall and build five residential apartments in the northwest portion of the site. The site where the grocery store is located is owned by Choice Properties and no application has been made to the City. Under the Planning Act, the City is required to process a development application and within certain timelines. The City will work in collaboration with the property owners in coordinating the policy and the development application reviews. To find more information on the development application, file OZ/OPA 22-32 (1250 South Service Road) please click here.

Stay involved

Subscribe to receive news alerts about future engagements at the top of the page.

If you wish to mail your comments, please send them to: Karin Phuong, Planning and Building - City Planning Strategies, City of Mississauga, 300 City Centre Dr, Mississauga, ON L5B 3C1.

Ask Us

loader image
Didn't receive confirmation?
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • It was refreshing to see the inclusion of "cycling and pedestrian connections" in addition to "transit" and "vehicles" listed under Item #6 Transportation Network of the Dixie Outlet Mall Policy Review. However, there appear to be no foot-bike network "connections" indicated on any of the maps or diagrams of the Dixie Outlet Mall Development and surrounding communities. A key piece of such a Transportation network was the Orchard Heights Park foot-bike bridge connecting SE Lakeview Mississauga to the Etobicoke Creek Trail to provide CONNECTED, CONVENIENT, COMFORTABLE and SAFE access for people of all ages and walks of life to the parks, playgrounds, sports fields, Long Branch TTC & Go Train stations, alternate bike commuting routes, the Waterfront Trail and Lake Ontario. The Orchard Heights Park foot-bike bridge was approved and funded by City of Mississauga Council in 2018 with installation scheduled for November 2019. However, as mentioned in the January 29th Policy Review Meeting, Ward 1 Councillor Dasko’s July 9, 2021 email to City of Mississauga Park Planning staff pre-emptively “put all plans for this on hold”, and nothing has been heard about the bridge since. The Orchard Heights Park foot-bike bridge is a key component of the City of Mississauga’s 2010-2018 Cycling Master Plan. My question is: How can a single email from a Ward Councillor stop a thoroughly researched, consulted, planned, approved and funded official City of Mississauga Master Plan? Other than virtue-signalling, what is the point of a public “Policy Review” exercise when the well-considered methodology, extensive consultation, detailed planning and scheduled execution of a project managed by professional City staff can be cancelled “with the stroke of a pen” by a Ward Councillor?

    Wolf Ruck asked 2 months ago

    Thank you for your comments. Improved access for cyclists and pedestrians is an on-going project and remains a key priority and a long-term plan of the City. The pedestrian bridge at the Orchard Heights Park is outside the area of the Dixie Outlet Mall Policy Review; however, staff have followed up with Park Development on your concerns. Please be advised that the pedestrian bridge project has been put on hold after considering all feedback received from the community and will be reassessed to address the concerns and feedback received through the previous public engagement.

    When the draft policies for the Dixie Outlet Mall are brought to the Planning and Development Committee for consideration and for final approval by City Council, City Planning staff will provide their professional opinion and recommendations. City Council is made up of the Mayor and 11 Ward Councillors. Approval, modification or rejection of policies is made by City Council as a whole, but cannot be done by an individual Councillor.

  • What I would like to see is a vast expansion of public transportation (an LRT, for example) along the Lakeshore and along Dixie Road running north/south. As well, what would be necessary before this development begins is the replacement of the facilities the plaza itself presently offers: a large grocery store - a No Frills, for example, would be best - with low-cost options (many seniors live in the area on a fixed income), community centres (the nearest are on Cawthra), buildings available for public use (such as for a Home Owners Association), as well as schools. The neighbourhoods around Dixie Mall EACH had a public school when the subdivisions were built. Every one of them has closed. We need schools at the same scale if the density is to be raised. In other words public schools from Kindergarten to Grade 6 in Orchard Heights, Lakeview, Ogden, Westacres, Applewood Acres, Sherway. All of these are now closed. A giant public school to replace all of these now closed schools should be included in the plans for Dixie Mall redevelopment.

    Homeowner asked 2 months ago

    Thank you for your comments. With the additional population growth in the area, the need and demand for increased public transit has been identified as an area for future improvement plans. 

    The property owner where the No Frills grocery store is located has not approached the City with a development application. The City cannot force development to retain a grocery store on site; the City’s proposed draft policies has provided emphasis on the importance of a grocery, for example, policy 13.1.14.13 Redevelopment must demonstrate how the new development provides a concentration and mix of non-residential uses and jobs that allow people to meet many of their needs, such as a grocery store, pharmacy and medical office that are within walking distance. 

    The City’s Community Services’ department is monitoring the impact of growth in the area to ensure that service delivery needs are being met. More information about the City’s Future Directions or plans for recreation is on the City’s website at www.mississauga.ca/futuredirections 

    The additional growth will require a school facility in the area. The location and size of a school facility is determined by the school board(s) through the development application review process.

  • It seems you want to make an overall change to a community by adding more housing the concern is the amount of traffic that will occur if this proceeds. There is already a sagering amout of traffic especially due to the contruction from the highway and closures happening. I do not see how adding housing will help this community when there is already enough issues. This plan should be reevaluated.

    AI asked 3 months ago

    Thank you for your comments. We understand your frustration with the current construction and lane closures in the area. Improvements to the QEW is anticipated to be completed in July 2026. You can find more information on the construction timelines at www.qewdixie.com.

    In regards to your concern on the increased traffic with the redevelopment of the Dixie Outlet Mall for housing, please be advised that the City has retained a transportation firm to assess the traffic impacts in the area. The study will consider future transportation infrastructure needs to support traffic movements. Furthermore, a development application made to the City will require that the applicant submit a satisfactory transportation impact study. If required, the applicant may be asked for mitigation strategies to improve traffic or to make changes their development proposal.

  • I am a young student from this neighborhood who will enter university next year, likely in the GTA. I am concerned about rent. What actions has the city taken to maximize the amount of units in this density at all costs?

    RW asked 3 months ago

    Thank you for your question. We are happy to hear that you will begin your journey into post-secondary school next year. If the concern about rent is in regards to protecting rental units, please be advised that the City has passed a Rental Housing Protection By-law to protect the existing rental housing supply in Mississauga. More information about this is available on the website at www.mississauga.ca/publication/rental-housing-protection-by-law/. For concerns related to rent increases, you can learn more about the rules for rent increases on the Province’s web site at www.ontario.ca/page/residential-rent-increases.  

    In terms of maximizing the residential density, the City is directing more growth and density to key locations across the city, including near major transit stations along light rail and bus rapid transit corridors (Hurontario Street and Dundas Street, respectively). When increases in residential density is balanced with other amenities e.g., grocery store, pharmacy, parks and other community uses, it can create liveable mixed use communities. For the Dixie Outlet Mall site, the City’s draft policy proposal would increase the building height in the Mississauga Official Plan from 4 storeys to allow for up to 15 storeys –while making sure that other amenities will be provided. It will also would encourage and provide for all types of housing and tenures.

  • Doesn’t the city/province dictate how much affordable or senior housing needs to be considered for a development such as this? Last we heard, most of the anticipated units were one bedrooms and price point expected close to 1mil. I fail to see how this accomplishes the ‘so called’ housing crisis, other than speculators buying to rent them out. The volume of property development throughout Mississauga and GTA has been exponential yet we have the highest homelessness rate in my lifetime - the math doesn’t make sense. As a resident near this development, I’d have been delighted to hear this area was being thoughtfully created with an aging population and young families in mind, with the right services and community spirit that this area has been known for for well over 55 years. Towers do not make communities - Park Lawn is a great example of over development and lack of forethought.

    E Adamson asked 3 months ago

    Thank you for your question. Inclusionary zoning is one tool that the City is using to require residential development to provide affordable housing. It applies to certain areas of the city that are within Protected Major Transit Station Areas. The Dixie Outlet Mall site is not an area which the City could require affordable housing, however, the City is encouraging all major developments proposals to include affordable housing.

  • I'm a senior with a small comfort dogs, who was carefully selected and have all documents and shots. Recently I have very unpleasant experience at Dixie Mall with outlet security guys. I was chased away at the entrance. Question: What a policy will be for seniors like me at Dixie place in a future? In a mall? In an apartments?

    DelMars asked 5 months ago

    We are truly sorry that you encountered an unfriendly experience at the Dixie Outlet Mall. According to their website, the Dixie Outlet Mall is committed to customer service excellence. It is advised that you contact their Services team at (905) 278-3494 or email info@dixioutletmall.com about your experience. In terms of policies for seniors, proposed official plan policies would not prescribe the level of retail customer service in a policy document, but there are policies that support aging in place to ensure that the needs for people at all stages of life, such as housing, are met.

  • Are you trying to build a PATH-like access under QEW with those huge cement things?

    chuck asked about 1 year ago

    Transportation planning and infrastructure projects for provincial highways are under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Transportation (MTO). The improvements to the QEW are undertaken by MTO and are not completed through the City’s Policy Review. This infrastructure improvement includes a number of construction components, including the replacement of the Dixie Road underpass bridge and reconfiguration of the QEW/Dixie Road and the installation of new retaining walls and noise barriers. For information about the QEW Dixie project, visit https://www.qewdixie.com/new-page. For information on the construction project, please contact the Construction Administrative team at the following email address: qewdixie@ghd.com

  • It seems greedy Slate Managment is planning is multi-phase high rise apartment complex instead of Dixie Mall with a density multiple times of recently approved Lakeview village and Brightwater. Traffic concerns alone, in addition to Manhattan style density for this site is very concerning and not acceptable to residents.

    Mohammad asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your comments. The owner of the property has submitted a development application under the Planning Act, and the materials have been circulated to City departments and public agencies for comment. Development application file number OZ/OPA 22-32 has not been approved and staff are continuing to take in comments on this application. Your comments will be noted for the file. Items such as land use, density and traffic are reviewed as part of the application process.

  • What measures, policies, bylaws will be in place to ensure that there are affordable, accessible, and appropriate housing for people? Will there be units available for people off the By Name List of people experiencing homelessness. Finally, what coordination is happening between the city and the Region?

    Michelle asked about 1 year ago

    Under current provincial legislation, the City does not have the ability to require affordable housing for this site. However, the proposed 2023 Provincial Planning Statement provides direction to planning authorities to coordinate planning for housing with Service Managers for a range housing options. The range of housing options also includes housing affordability needs. The Policy Review is considering additional policies and measures for the site to ensure that a mix of housing options is provided for this site; any proposed new or updated official plan policies will be implemented through an Official Plan Amendment (OPA).

    The Region of Peel is a commenting agency and circulated on development applications and City initiated OPAs. The Region is a community housing provider that works with developers and other partners to build new affordable housing and emergency shelters. For more information on the Region’s housing and shelter please visit https://www.peelregion.ca/housing/

  • I am curious about a number of items regarding this development. 1. It looks like Slate is submitting applications for portions of the site for approval as opposed to providing a plan for the full site. Is this not problematic? How do we know the full plan and impact on the community, infrastructure and green space when it is revealed piece meal? What regulations and processes can the City use to ensure the full picture is revealed before approvals of each parcel request? How can you properly plan without the bigger picture? 2. How do you determine infrastructure needs for a development this size? Transport, emergency services, underground sewage, parking, traffic flow. Is it possible that a piece meal approach could impact Slate's ability to get further development approved because they might have reached maximum infrastructure capacity?

    Janet Jackson asked about 1 year ago

    The Planning Act, legislation passed and administered by the Province on land use planning matters in Ontario, requires that municipalities are obligated to accept and process development applications submitted by any property owner upon the submission of all required materials and information. In this scenario, the Dixie Outlet Mall property owner has extended their right to make an application for only a portion of their lands and as such, the City is processing the application as per the Planning Act. In light of the development application, Council has acknowledged the importance of reviewing the rest of the site, and has directed staff to undertake this policy review. Evaluation of the development applications will be made based on the policy framework in place today, but will have regard for matters that come about from the policy review project.

    Part of the development application process is to circulate all comments department and agencies to view items such as servicing, traffic etc. The policy review for the rest of the site will engage the same departments and agencies in order to review these items but on a broader scale, as it relates to the entirety of the property. Ultimately, infrastructure requirements will have to be satisfied through both processes.

Page last updated: 06 Mar 2024, 04:17 PM